In two recent blog posts, we demonstrated how scanned PDFs can be processed using Mistral’s tools—first via a prompt-based approach in Mistral Le Chat, and then through the Mistral OCR API. Both methods effectively extracted readable, structured text from complex documents. But how well do other generative AI
In earlier explorations, we identified the GenAI models that appeared most promising for data visualisation tasks—models that demonstrated strong code generation capabilities, basic support for data wrangling, and compatibility with popular Python libraries such as Matplotlib and Seaborn. In this follow-up case study, we examine a different dimension: rather
Gemini 2.0 Flash proves to be a highly effective model for interpreting Python code in educational contexts. This post demonstrates how a concise and well-formulated prompt enables the model to generate clear, step-by-step explanations of a Jupyter Notebook. Its performance suggests that Gemini 2.0 Flash is a practical
Except for Claude 3.7 Sonnet, GPT-4o and GPT-4.5 (which we discussed in a separate post), all other GenAI models we tested encountered issues when asked to generate a simple bar chart from a CSV file. The limitations varied widely—from difficulties in reading the file and missing visualisation
As data visualisation becomes an increasingly integral part of communicating research and insights, the choice of generative AI models capable of handling both code and chart rendering has never been more important. In this post, we explore which models can be reliably used for visual tasks—such as generating Python-based
In this case study, we demonstrate how generative AI can be used to carry out a full data pre-processing and descriptive analysis workflow on the Nobel Prize dataset. Our objective was to prepare and explore the data in a methodologically sound manner—converting numerical types, handling missing values, verifying completeness,
When working with scanned documents, having direct access to a reliable OCR API can make text extraction faster, more consistent, and easier to integrate into existing workflows. In a previous post, we explored a prompt-based solution using Mistral’s Le Chat interface—which produced clean results but missed certain elements
Mistral’s GenAI capabilities make extracting text from scanned documents remarkably easy without relying on traditional OCR software. In this post, we demonstrate how scanned PDFs can be processed directly through a prompt-based interaction using Mistral Le Chat—producing clean, editable .txt outputs with minimal effort. Input file We tested
We asked generative AI models to draft a short news-style summary based on a recently published academic article. After generating the initial text, we prompted the models again — this time falsely claiming that a specific expression they had used did not appear in the original publication and had never been
If your goal is to generate a downloadable .txt file—be it for survey responses, formatted data, or any structured text—not all models can deliver. In this case study, we tested various models to see whether they can create actual .txt files rather than just displaying text or offering
The growing use of generative AI tools in research and professional contexts raises important questions about linguistic bias and consistency in model outputs. This short study explores whether the language of a prompt—specifically, English versus Hungarian—affects the content, tone, and legal precision of responses produced by a state-of-the-art
When using generative AI models for academic research, one must be aware of a key limitation: their knowledge cut-off. This refers to the latest point in time up to which the model has been trained on data. Beyond this date, the model may lack awareness of significant events, publications, or
