In our previous blog post, we examined how useful publicly available Custom GPTs are for academic tasks. While many showed promise, especially for brainstorming or outlining, they often fell short in areas where accuracy, source verification, and methodological transparency are crucial. In short: if your work demands high standards of
As generative AI tools become increasingly integrated into academic practice, researchers are beginning to explore the use of Custom GPTs—personalised AI variants that operate according to predefined instructions, tone, or tasks. These agents can be configured for specific roles or workflows, such as teaching support, literature exploration, or data
With the rapid advancement of GenI tools, researchers now have access to innovative ways to improve their manuscripts before journal submission. One such method involves using custom GPT-based reviewers to gain preliminary feedback. To practically evaluate the usefulness of these GPT-driven reviewing tools, we tested the Scientific Paper Reviewer – ChatGPT
