In this experiment, we tested Manus AI’s ability to generate a full academic presentation from a research paper. The tool produced a slide deck that was functional and visually adequate, though not every slide was directly usable. The Manus AI interface supported adjustments before downloading—such as modifying layout,
We tested the new Sonnet 4.5 model on a demanding academic task: transforming a research paper into a structured 15-slide outline for a conference presentation. The prompt required not only conceptual rigour and narrative coherence but also attention to visual communication, with clear guidance on where charts, tables, and
Prezi’s new AI tool promises to transform documents into ready-made presentations. Our tests show that while the tool produces visually appealing slides, the generated content often drifts away from the uploaded source material. Using sustainability reports from Audi and the Hungarian National Bank, as well as an academic article,
In this post, we examine the performance of Manus’s newly updated slide generation tool when applied to a peer-reviewed scientific article. The developers claim recent improvements focused on enhancing the tool’s ability to support academic communication. To test these capabilities, we selected a published study in political science
Generative AI has made extraordinary strides in recent years, reshaping how researchers write, code, and even analyse data. But a key question remains for academics hoping to automate more of their daily work: Can popular GenAI models like Copilot, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Gemini 2.0 Flash, GPT-4o, Grok 3
