Using GenAI to Explore Research Questions about AI’s Impact on Education

Using GenAI to Explore Research Questions about AI’s Impact on Education
Source: Freepik - pixaflow

Artificial Intelligence is rapidly reshaping the educational landscape, but what do we really know about its effects on learning, teaching, and classroom dynamics? With the help of GenAI, we can begin to frame research questions that tackle these complex issues head-on. In this blog, we demonstrate how GenAI can be used to guide the formulation of research questions. We tested the prompt on the topic of AI in education, but its structure can easily be adapted to other fields as well.

This prompt serves as a model for structuring early-stage research thinking. It encourages identifying a specific challenge or knowledge gap and prompts consideration of the issue from multiple perspectives—whether practical, theoretical, or societal. In our test case, the topic focused on the impact of AI-based tools on student engagement and learning outcomes. The prompt also encourages reflection on the broader significance of the issue, including ethical implications and potential long-term effects.

Prompt

AI Integration in Education – Research Question Formulation

Using the field of educational technology as a starting point, explore the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the classroom with the aim of identifying meaningful directions for future research.

Focus on a specific challenge or gap—such as understanding how AI-based tools affect student engagement and learning outcomes—and reflect on why this topic matters to educators, students, and the wider educational landscape.

Discuss potential benefits of AI integration, along with ethical considerations and broader implications for teaching and learning.

Conclude your response with 3 to 5 clear, researchable questions that could help guide efforts to improve educational practice through AI.

Output

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping the landscape of educational technology, offering transformative possibilities for how teaching and learning occur in the classroom. One critical challenge worth exploring is how AI-based tools influence student engagement and learning outcomes. This issue stands out because engagement is a key driver of learning success, yet the integration of AI tools—such as adaptive learning platforms, intelligent tutoring systems, or AI-driven feedback mechanisms—introduces both opportunities and uncertainties. Understanding this dynamic is essential for educators aiming to foster active participation, for students navigating new modes of learning, and for the broader educational ecosystem seeking to balance innovation with equity and efficacy.

Why This Matters

The interplay between AI tools, engagement, and learning outcomes is significant because it touches the core of education: fostering environments where students are motivated and able to achieve meaningful growth. Educators need evidence to determine whether AI enhances or detracts from these goals, especially as classrooms become more diverse and technology-reliant. For students, AI could personalize learning experiences, but it might also risk disengagement if tools feel impersonal or overly prescriptive. At a systemic level, the stakes involve ensuring that AI supports educational goals—like critical thinking and creativity—rather than narrowing them to measurable metrics alone. This challenge is a linchpin for deciding how AI can serve education holistically.

Potential Benefits of AI Integration

AI-based tools offer several promising benefits. First, they can personalize learning by adapting content to individual student needs, pacing, and preferences, potentially increasing engagement for learners who might otherwise struggle in a one-size-fits-all model. For example, platforms like Duolingo use AI to tailor language exercises, keeping students challenged yet supported. Second, AI can enhance feedback loops, providing real-time, specific insights to students and freeing teachers from repetitive grading tasks to focus on higher-order instruction. Third, AI can scale access to quality education, such as through virtual tutors for underserved regions, addressing resource gaps. These benefits could lead to deeper engagement and improved outcomes, particularly when students feel ownership over their learning process.

Ethical Considerations and Broader Implications

However, integrating AI raises ethical questions that complicate its promise. Privacy is a major concern—AI tools often rely on collecting student data, which could be misused or inadequately protected. Equity is another: not all schools can afford advanced AI systems, potentially widening achievement gaps. There’s also the risk of over-reliance, where students or teachers defer too heavily to AI, undermining independent thinking or human judgment. For engagement specifically, AI might inadvertently reduce interaction if students feel monitored by algorithms rather than connected to peers or instructors. Broader implications include a shift in teaching roles—educators might become facilitators of tech-mediated learning—and a need to redefine learning outcomes in an AI-augmented world, balancing technical skills with human-centric competencies like empathy.

Meaningful Directions for Future Research

To advance this field, research must dig into the nuances of AI’s impact on engagement and outcomes. Here are 3 to 5 researchable questions to guide these efforts:

  • How do specific AI tools (e.g., adaptive learning systems vs. chat-based tutors) differentially affect student engagement across diverse classroom settings?
  • What is the relationship between AI-driven personalization and measurable learning outcomes, such as retention or critical thinking skills, in comparison to traditional methods?
  • How do students’ perceptions of AI tools—such as trust, autonomy, or frustration—influence their engagement and performance over time?
  • In what ways can AI integration be designed to enhance, rather than replace, teacher-student and peer-to-peer interactions in the classroom?
  • What are the long-term effects of AI tool usage on student agency and self-directed learning, particularly for underrepresented or struggling learners?

These questions push beyond surface-level adoption, aiming to align AI with the deeper goals of education—engagement, growth, and equity—while navigating its ethical complexities. They invite empirical studies, classroom experiments, and longitudinal tracking to build a robust evidence base for educators and policymakers.

We tested the prompt using Grok 3, and the output is coherent, well-structured, and fully aligned with the task. It articulates the challenge, covers benefits and ethical concerns, and reflects multiple stakeholder perspectives. The research questions are a particular strength—specific, relevant, and varied in focus. The tone is reflective and academically sound. A minor limitation is the lack of diverse real-world examples and actionable insights in the ethics section. Still, the result shows strong potential for using GenAI in early-stage research design.

The authors used Grok 3 [xAI (2025) Grok 3 (accessed on 23 March 2025), Large language model (LLM), available at: https://x.ai/grok] to generate the output.