Rebeka Kiss

Evolving File Handling in GenAI Models: Stronger Input Support, Persistent Output Limitations

In a previous blog, we examined the file handling capabilities of leading GenAI interfaces. That analysis detailed which formats they could process reliably and where they encountered difficulties—particularly with structured data and technical file types. Since then, the landscape has shifted. While downloadable file generation still faces notable constraints,

by Rebeka Kiss

Enhancing Research Productivity: A Comprehensive Guide to Canvas and Artifacts in GenAI Interfaces

These tools provide dedicated spaces for creating, refining, and managing content alongside artificial intelligence interactions, facilitating tasks from data visualisation to manuscript drafting. This guide, tailored for researchers, examines their practical applications, operational mechanisms, distinctions, version control capabilities, memory management, and availability in other models. By leveraging these interfaces, researchers

by Rebeka Kiss

Testing Academia.edu’s AI Reviewer: Technical Errors and Template-Based Feedback

Academia.edu has recently introduced an AI-based Reviewer tool, positioned as a solution for generating structured feedback on academic manuscripts. While the concept is promising, our evaluation revealed a number of significant limitations. We encountered recurring technical issues during both file uploads and Google Docs integration, often requiring multiple attempts

by Rebeka Kiss

Gemini’s ‘Audio Overview’ as a Tool for Open Science: Turning Scientific Papers into Accessible Audio

Can artificial intelligence make academic research more accessible to non-specialist audiences—or even to busy researchers on the go? Gemini’s new ‘Audio Overview’ feature provides a novel way to experience scientific papers: through short, conversational audio summaries. Available even in the free version of Gemini 2.5 Flash, this

by Rebeka Kiss

Testing the Limits of AI Peer Review: When Even Ian Goodfellow Gets Rejected by OpenReviewer

High-quality feedback is essential for researchers aiming to improve their work and navigate the peer review process more effectively. Ideally, such feedback would be available before formal submission—allowing authors to identify the strengths and weaknesses of their research early on. This is precisely the promise of OpenReviewer, an automated

by Rebeka Kiss